Bookmark this page |
Tag to del.icio.us
| Add to Technorati Favorites
|
Our discussion forum is open for business. Come say hello. |
Sunday, May 27, 2007
Ronald Reagan: A legacy of surrender?
By VictorM: Let's take a stroll down memory lane and and try to relate this one event to Republicans today using the term "surrender" to reflect the will of the American people about the Iraq war.Beirut remained a dangerous place for US citizens to live and during the 1980s, 270 American people were killed in bombings, assassinations and kidnappings and five were abducted but later released...
US President Ronald Reagan ordered military personnel to begin pulling out of the area over a week ago following a recent upsurge in terrorist attacks.
The withdrawal ends 18 months of conflict in a country which has been torn apart by war with Israel.
Despite the withdrawal, President Reagan insisted that the US was not turning its back on Lebanon.
"Once the terrorist attacks started there was no way that we could really contribute to the original mission by staying there as a target just bunkering down and waiting for further attacks," he said.
"I don't think we have lost as yet, although I know things don't look too bright. As long as there is a chance we are not bugging out.
"We are moving to deploy into a more defensive position."
So, you tell me, did Ronald Reagan surrender? Is he to blame for sending the message that terrorism can succeed against America?
Links to this post:
You are not on our Home Page.
Click here to return to ARGville's Home Page



