ARGville

Chewing politics and current events one bite-size chunk at a time
Opinions about current events, politics, religion, pop culture, and society.
And the occasional comment on soccer, the world's game.

 




Tuesday, January 06, 2009

 

Make up your mind Alaska

Two polls in Alaska pit Sarah Palin versus Lisa Murkowski for the US Senate seat in 2010. Quite a shift in opinions, no?
A Dittman Research poll shows Murkowski leading this year’s GOP vice presidential nominee in the hypothetical matchup, 57-33, according to KTUU-TV in Anchorage. That contrasts with a Research 2000 poll from mid-December that showed Palin on top 55-31.
What accounts for the difference? The earlier poll must have oversampled horny teenagers and infatuated Republican males.


Monday, January 05, 2009

 

Sore loser?

News from Minnesota:
The Minnesota state canvassing board has officially certified the election results showing that Al Franken is the winner of the Minnesota recount -- by a tally of 1,212,431 votes to 1,212,206 votes. But the contest between Franken and Coleman is far from over, as the Coleman camp has promised to file a challenge of the election in court.
Does this mean, in the parlance of those who supported Bush in 2000 during the whole Florida court fight, that they think Coleman is a sore loser?

"Senator Al Franken." Get used to the sounds of that, people.

 

Atheists coming out of the closet

Hopefully, we'll see more of this around the world:
"There's probably no God. Stop worrying. Enjoy life". So read the signs developed by atheist groups in Barcelona, which will being appearing on some of the city’s public buses in the following weeks. Inspired by a recent atheist campaign in London, the messages have already been widely criticized by the Catholic church.
We've got to stop giving believers a monopoly on the message about the existence of gods.

I particularly like this message because of the word "probably." Makes the message less confrontational, less absolute, less fanatical, and more reasonable.

I think these kinds of actions are important, not because they will change the minds of any religious person, but I suspect there are a lot of people who truly are atheists but who are afraid to say so, same even afraid to consider the possibility. Knowing they're not alone might free them to give both sides an equal measure of consideration.

 

The Republican world: Everyone is basically pissed

After eight years of political misery, Republicans are now making my day:
The RNC competition is taking place in a contentious environment. A Republican consultant who has worked with the RNC told the Politico: "Some people are pissed off at [Americans for Tax Reform President] Grover [Norquist]. Some people are pissed off at the Conservative Steering Committee. Some people are pissed off at [current RNC chair] Mike Duncan. Some people are pissed off at social conservatives. The social conservatives are pissed at leaders in Congress. Everyone is basically pissed."
Come on guys, let me help you. The solution to your problems is simple: you need to be more conservative, more divisive, more hateful, greedier, and rally around Sarah Palin. Yeah... that's the ticket.


Sunday, January 04, 2009

 

Misaligned interests of the many

I am often perplexed when non rich folks defend the interests of the rich. I have posed that question here before but have not found a satisfactory answer. Until now:
The Madoff scandal echoes a deeper absence inside our financial system, which has been undermined not merely by bad behavior but by the lack of checks and balances to discourage it. “Greed” doesn’t cut it as a satisfying explanation for the current financial crisis. Greed was necessary but insufficient; in any case, we are as likely to eliminate greed from our national character as we are lust and envy. The fixable problem isn’t the greed of the few but the misaligned interests of the many.
"The misaligned interests of the many." That is the reason.

Every sucker who defends the rights of the rich to exploit, loophole, and cheat their way into bigger fortunes is doing so because they know that if given an opportunity, they would do exactly the same thing. It doesn't matter to these folks how many people get fleeced along the way as long as they feel they can share in the spoils. "The misaligned interests of the many."

 

For Global Warming deniers

Forget all the science and the predictions of impending disasters; just consider the calls to address global warming in the vein of the Bush doctrine, only for the environment.

Are you with us now?

 

Breaking up America

The Washington Post has a story about some Kremlin analyst's prediction that in 2010 the US will break into six:
Alaska goes to Russia. Hawaii goes to Japan or China. "The California Republic" -- the West from Utah and Arizona to the Pacific -- goes to China. "The Texas Republic" -- the South from New Mexico to Florida -- goes to Mexico. "Atlantic America" -- the Northeast from Tennessee and South Carolina up to Maine -- joins the European Union. And "The Central North-American Republic" -- the Plains from Ohio to Montana -- goes to Canada.
What puzzles me is why the Washington Post dedicated 3 online pages to this dopey story. Although, I confess, I like the idea of Alaska going to Russia. This way they'd gain a governor with lots of international experience.


Saturday, January 03, 2009

 

Bush policies: an utter failure

One creep talking about another:
Former U.S.-installed Iraqi Prime Minister Iyad Allawi has denounced the policies of President George W. Bush as an "utter failure" that gave rise to the sectarian venom that ravaged his country.
Not that I disagree, but these two deserve each other.

 

A way with words

Boris Johnson, the mayor of London, talking about Gordon Brown, the Prime Minister of England:
Bring it on, you great big quivering gelatinous invertebrate jelly of indecision.
That's what American politics needs more of: politicians with a good repertoire of words with more than 2 syllables.

 

What are you doing here?

This sounds like the setup for a joke, but it's not:

WARSAW (Reuters) - A Polish man got the shock of his life when he visited a brothel and spotted his wife among the establishment's employees.

Polish tabloid Super Express said the woman had been making some extra money on the side while telling her husband she worked at a store in a nearby town.

"I was dumfounded. I thought I was dreaming," the husband told the newspaper on Wednesday.

The couple, married for 14 years, are now divorcing, the newspaper reported.

I bet she'll be better off financially without him.

 

10 and 3

Sarah van Gelder can think of 10 reasons to be hopeful about 2009, and 3 reasons to be fearful. Here's one example of what to be hopeful about:
The failing economy is giving us lots of reasons to be terrified (see below) but also reasons to be hopeful. That rip-roaring economy we're all supposed to be trying to bring back was tearing through the world's rainforests, mountaintops, aquifers, fisheries, soils and other resources, driving thousands of species toward extinction, changing the climate and leaving billions behind in the rush for "economic growth." So, painful as it might be, this downturn represents a chance to build a different sort of economy -- one that offers dignity, livelihoods and a future for our children.
I don't know... where lots of money are involved, greed can't be far behind. I would like to believe that we have learned our lesson, but we have the collective historical memory of a moth. While some positive changes are likely, the words "dignity" and "economy" on the same sentence sound like too much wishful thinking.


 

Worry bitches, worry

Well, doesn't this just break my heart:

To some staunch conservatives watching President Bush relinquish the reins of power to President-elect Barack Obama, a few too many ardent liberals are now crashing the gates... Conservatives fear that some of these Obama transition advisers are too far left on the political spectrum and are a sign of radical policies to come.
I can only hope so. Radical policies from what we've seen is what this country needs.




Friday, January 02, 2009

 

True Christian my ass

If George Bush were a true christian, wouldn't he have turned the other cheek to the shoe thrower instead of ducking? Wouldn't he also forgive him?

I have no fondness for Popes, but I remember when John Paul II went to visit in prison the man who attempted to assassinate him. Can anyone imagine George Bush having that type of conviction?

I know... I know... George Bush's religion was just a political prop.

 

Go bitches, go

The sound of Republicans leaving Washington DC is music to my ears:
Out of power on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue and mostly out of favor on K Street, many emasculated elephants in the GOP herd will begin the Age of Obama with what amounts to an extended holiday vacation. Instead of fighting the quadrennial cold and what are expected to be record-setting crowds, they're heading out to greener pastures, with better temperatures, less hassle and more agreeable company.
Don't let the door hit you, weasels.

 

The party of racial backlash

I'm always looking to understand how the Republican party got to where it is. Paul Krugman give us his take on that party's journey to what I called the party of hate, greed, and stupid. His column is excellent, as usual. Give it a read.
Forty years ago the G.O.P. decided, in effect, to make itself the party of racial backlash. And everything that has happened in recent years, from the choice of Mr. Bush as the party’s champion, to the Bush administration’s pervasive incompetence, to the party’s shrinking base, is a consequence of that decision...

That’s why the soon-to-be-gone administration’s failure is bigger than Mr. Bush himself: it represents the end of the line for a political strategy that dominated the scene for more than a generation...

Will the Republicans eventually stage a comeback? Yes, of course. But barring some huge missteps by Mr. Obama, that will not happen until they stop whining and look at what really went wrong. And when they do, they will discover that they need to get in touch with the real “real America,” a country that is more diverse, more tolerant, and more demanding of effective government than is dreamt of in their political philosophy.

As the whole Magic Negro fiasco shows, the Republican party has a long way to go. And as long as they see the government as the problem, they can't be a solution.

 

Bring on the Cuban cigars

Is it time to end the Cuban embargo? I say Yes! There's probably no better way to end the grip of the communists than the influence of external goods to enter the island. But... it's not all roses. As mentioned in the quote below, there are reasons for concern:

Would Cuba benefit if the embargo ended? The answer is yes, but with caveats. In most Caribbean countries that have accepted the hand of American friendship or been placed under American occupation since Castro’s revolution, life is not appreciably better than in Cuba. Next to the poverty, crime, and squalor that infest the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Nicaragua, or Honduras, or the living nightmare that is Haiti, Cuba is a glowing achievement. It has the highest literacy rate in the hemisphere, excellent healthcare, and a vibrant, well funded cultural life.

Yeah, if we do business as usual, the other examples in the region don't bode well for success. Still, I think Obama should go for it:

From Washington’s point of view, though, it would be a smart, pragmatic move for Obama to end the embargo. It would open a new and under-exploited market to struggling American businesses and remove at a stroke the Castro regime’s most effective rallying point. The resonance would be heard far beyond Cuba, not least in Venezuela and Bolivia.

I would like to see it happen, but frankly, I'm not counting on it.


Thursday, January 01, 2009

 

Heckuva job, George

This is what incompetence looks like:

To mark the passing of Bush’s last full year in office, ThinkProgress rounded up statistics on some of the most significant effects of Bush rule in 2008:

Number Of U.S. Troops Killed in Iraq: 322.
Number Of U.S. Troops Killed in Afghanistan: 151.
Number Of Jobs Lost: 1.9 million.
Number Of Banks Federal Government Now Owns Stock In: 206.
Number Of Uninsured Americans: 47.5 million.

Change In Housing Prices: declined 18 percent.
Change In Health Insurance Premiums: increased 5 percent.
Change In Number Of Delinquent Mortgages: increased 75 percent.
Change In Use Of Food Stamps: increased 17 percent.
Change In Dow Jones Industrial Average: declined 35 percent.
Change In Bush Approval Rating: declined 9 percent to 29 percent.

Too bad we can't measure the actual harm from not addressing global warming, or have a good measure of how despised this nation has become worldwide, or how to measure the hurt on GLBT communities... really, the incompetence has been mind-boggling.

 

R.I.P Helen

Unsung hero:
Helen Suzman, one of the fiercest internal critics of apartheid, South Africa’s hated system of racial separation, has died at her home in Johannesburg aged 91. The daughter of Lithuanian Jews, she first entered the South African parliament in 1953 and for 13 years was the only MP to condemn South Africa's whites-only regime. She was a frequent visitor to Nelson Mandela when he was held in Robben Island prison for 18 years and was twice nominated for the Noble Peace Prize. Although ailing in recent years, Suzman, who never married, continued to speak out against what she saw as the failings of South Africa's post-apartheid administration.
Just to illustrate how difficult her fight was, I find it ironic that at the time I made this post there was one visitor comment under the link above:
It remains to be seen whether a NON-APARTHEID South Africa is a good thing.

 

Lets not forget the rascals

Worst administration ever? I think so:
As we enter the New Year let us not forget those wonderful little rascals from the GOP's Our Gang Comedy: Condi, Turd Blossom, Brownie, Gonzo and Scooter who played such crazy tricks on our country. Just consider what these lovable scamps did in the past eight years: they ignored the warning about 9/11; they left the poor of New Orleans to languish and die after Katrina; they tricked this country into a calamitous, life taking, bank breaking war; they abused our planet by failing to meet environmental standards; they shackled scientific research, made a sneaky grab for extra-constitutional power, blurred the separation of church and state, corrupted the Justice Department, and helped to destroy the economy by the deregulation of oversight. It wasn't just the housing bubble that burst - all bubbles pop - it was the greed driven life that came to us through Bush and his people, the governmental dishonesty flowing outward to our financial markets which didn't need much encouragement to become Hedge Fund hawks and Ponzi style swindlers.
It's overwhelming when you see lists of just how bad these guys were. And the above list, frankly, is a partial one.

 

A toast to the Republican party

This mock toast to the Republican party for their abysmal 2008 is spot on. Treat yourself to the whole article.
You launched into a presidential primary crawling with Mormons, cross-dressers, gay-hating bass players, and one enraged septuagenarian. You ran the one least likely to be alive in November, and you paired him up with a beauty queen whose political talent amounted to knowing five different ways of saying, "I know you are but what am I?"

You lost one veteran Senator to an indictment. Liddy Dole made sure that the Bush dynasty would be the only GOP family dynasty to come to an inglorious end this year. You became known as the party of hate-mongering, your "base" was characterized by people demanding that their opponent be murdered.

As the "Magic Negro" song parody scandal reached its high point, many on your side began saying, "This could actually work out for us."
Somehow, I have the feeling that 2009 isn't going to be much better. In their civil war, the nastiest Republicans will win out over moderates and we're likely to see more outlandish behavior.

 

Happy New Year

I don't know about you, but 2009 feels like the start of the 21st century. The last eight years felt like the Dark Ages. We should try to bury them as deep as we can and try to start anew.


Wednesday, December 31, 2008

 

Top Ten Worst Americans

Michael Tomasky has a list of the worst 19 Americans. Steve Benen adds a few of his own. Borrowing from them, I made my own list. For me, personal failings (Spitzer, Edwards) do not make the list. I looked for individuals or organizations that caused the greatest harm to large numbers of people or to institutions:

10. Rod Blagojevich - For staining a profession that's already viewed with much cynicism.

9. Michelle Bachmann - Her calls for a political witch hunt cut too close to Joe McCarthy.

8. Rick Warren - Better tone is not enough -- he still promotes hate and division, and his megaphone is getting louder.

7. Phil Gramm - As Steve said: Not only did Gramm's policies help create the financial nightmare, but he mocked Americans' pain, calling us a "nation of whiners."

6. Mormon Church - A despicable display of championing anti-civil rights and enormous cojones to boot, considering their history of marriage between a man and several women.

5. The Republican Party - For their penchant for disenfranchisement, their lack of ideas, their game plan of dividing Americans, their support of propaganda, and their array of the most unqualified and hateful presidential candidates.

4. Sarah Palin - Michael said it well: Never in my adult lifetime has one politician so perfectly embodied everything that is malign about my country: the proto-fascist nativism, the know-nothingism, the utterly cavalier lack of knowledge about the actual principles on which the country was founded. So, heck, you betcha she does!

3. Dick Cheney - A vile man in every respect. In some ways he deserves the number one spot, but the number two guy can never be worse than the one that lets him be there.

2. John McCain - He gets no free ride from me. He selected Palin, he hired Schmidt, he approved of a Karl Rove like campaign, and he scared the shit out of millions of Americans by spreading the Marxist-terrorist bullshit about Obama. Forget his Vietnam service; the man sunk to the bottom of the pond. Plus, of course, "the fundamentals of the economy are strong."

1. George Bush - Yglesias summarizes it well: he wrecked the world economy, he led to millions of Iraqis being forced to flee their homes, he’s a total disaster and a disgrace.

 

Bush's legacy

So George Bush is looking to fabricate a legacy, huh? If fabrication is what he wants, here's my suggestion:



 

Great moment in American television

Former US National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski to Joe the Plumber Scarborough:
"You know, you have such a stunningly superficial knowledge of what went on that it's almost embarrassing to listen to you."
This video is about 9 minutes long, but if you want to get a better sense of what's going on between the Palestinians and Israel right now, plus get to see Scarborough schooled, take a look:



I love it when later in the video he says I'll spell it for you T-A-B-A... the Taba negotiations, look it up.

It is remarkable to listen to Dr. Brzezinski's clarity of thought and grasp of knowledge on the issues of the Middle East as compared to the pundit class.

I have to admit that, like Joe, I always believed that Arafat was the one to walk away from the deal that Clinton worked on. I'm sure that's how the American press (already under the spell of the Bush administration) spun that. I was amazed to find out, after reading about Taba, that it was not so! It was Ehud Barak, with no apparent pressure from Bush, who walked away from an almost done deal for peace in the middle east.


Tuesday, December 30, 2008

 

Bush, the avid reader

The task of trying to make up a legacy continues, this time with an op-ed piece by Carl Rove claiming that George Bush is an avid reader. OK... maybe he is, but Richard Cohen went through the list of books that Bush allegedly read, and reaches some interesting conclusions:
It is awfully late in the day for Rove -- and, presumably, Bush -- to assert the president's intellectual bona fides. Now feeling the hot breath of history, they are dropping the good ol' boy persona and picking up the ol' bifocals one. But the books themselves reveal -- actually, confirm -- something about Bush that maybe Rove did not intend. They are not the reading of a widely read man, but instead the books of a man who seeks -- and sees -- vindication in every page...

My hat is off to Bush for the sheer volume and, often, high quality of his reading. But his books reflect a man who is seeking to learn what he already knows. The caricature of Bush as unread died today -- or was it yesterday? But the reality of the intellectually insulated man endures.
I don't trust Carl Rove but giving him the benefit of the doubt for a minute, and assuming he's telling the truth, maybe Bush should have read fewer books and poked his head into the real world more often. Maybe he should have read newspapers, which he claims he did not do. Maybe he should have read the intelligence briefings himself instead of having them read to him.

Besides, reading is one thing, but learning is another.

 

10 bad moments of the Bush presidency

We know he's the worst president ever. His failures are so many that it's hard to keep track. Here is a refresher of 10 of the Bush's administration bad moments.

This is a good selection, but frankly, the list could be of 100 bad moments, so fertile is the history of Bush's bumbling moments.

 

Most annoying verbal ticks of 2008

Courtesy of Bill in Portland Maine:
  • 'Look...' (Barack Obama)
  • 'Ladies and gentlemen...' (Joe Biden)
  • 'My friends...' (John McCain)
  • 'Also...' (Sarah Palin)
  • 'Well...' (Hillary Clinton)
  • 'I understand that!' (George W. Bush)
  • [Whine] (Joe Lieberman)
  • 'Nine eleven' (Rudy Giuliani)
  • 'If you will...' (Mitt Romney)
  • 'It's not fair!' (PUMA)

 

A party in peril, part 2

Another sign that the Republican party won't find its way out of the wilderness anytime soon:
It's now becoming clear that there is a good-sized contingent of Republicans who are openly defending Chip Saltsman, the former Tennessee GOP chairman and candidate for RNC chair who sent out a CD to committee members that includes a parody song called "Barack The Magic Negro."
Remember, this CD was sent by a guy running for leadership of the party.

It really doesn't matter if you find the parody funny or not; this guy is not a comedian doing stand up at your local comedy club. He is aiming for the leadership of a political party, with all the symbolism that major political parties represent. That most leaders in that party don't see that speaks volumes about their disconnect with decent Americans.

 

He kept us safe

George Bush, some on his administration, and even his own wife, want to convince us that George Bush isn't the worst president ever because if nothing else, he kept us safe.

George Bush did not keep us safe!

Under George Bush's presidency, we suffered the worst terrorist attack in the world. His sympathizers like to say that the 9/11 attacks couldn't have been stopped, but that's a lie. We may not have succeeded in stopping the attacks, but we didn't even try, despite ample warning. So, no, George Bush did not keep us safe.

Of course, they add a disclaimer to the statement. "He kept us safe... after 9/11." But we shouldn't fall for that trap. He was president on 9/11/2001, and had been so for almost 9 months. He bears full responsibility for the inaction before it.

What about the anthrax attacks? Those happened on his watch. Not only did we accuse the wrong person, we never really stopped the culprit.

What about Americans in Iraq? America isn't just the expensive homes and lavish office buildings on its soil; it includes all Americans, regardless of where they live. Over 4,000 dead and over 44,000 wounded (and the numbers, unfortunately, is still rising) were not kept safe by this president.

What about all the Americans who died or were wounded in terrorist attacks in England, Spain, India, Indonesia, and many other parts of the world? They weren't kept safe by this president.

What about the victims of hurricane Katrina? Sure, the president isn't responsible for the hurricane itself and most of the damage it caused, but many died and suffered because the president simply didn't care. He was the one who appointed the brutally incompetent team that headed FEMA. George Bush did not keep those Americans safe.

And why are we still under code level orange for air travel? How safe are we if the threat level is that high and has been there all these years?

George Bush initially opposed the formation of the department of Homeland Security. He opposed its Secretary being a Cabinet position. And for crying out loud, he had initially picked Bernie Kerik to head that department.

Osama bin Laden and his organization are still alive and killing. Mohammed Omar and the Taliban are still alive and killing.

Let's face it, in many ways, George Bush spread more fear among the American population than any cave dweller on this planet. In fact, he kept the nation under such grip of fear that even one of our presidential candidates was perceived by many as a terrorist.

George Bush did not keep us safe!


Monday, December 29, 2008

 

I'm not making this up: Conservatism 2.0

There's some kind of conference by right wingers to discuss the future of the conservative movement and one of the three stars of the conference is the eloquent, the visionary, the dazzling... Joe the plumber. *snicker*


 

Abstinence pledges: like trickle down economics

The results of this study on abstinence don't really surprise me:
Teenagers who pledge to remain virgins until marriage are just as likely to have premarital sex as those who do not promise abstinence and are significantly less likely to use condoms and other forms of birth control when they do, according to a study released today.
How is this like trickle down economics? Because whether you like it or not, understand it or not, believe it or not, you're getting fucked anyway.

 

Torn between two opinions

The only thing I'm sure about economics is that I don't know enough about it to speak with authority on the subject. The bigger problem is I feel most talking heads are in the same boat. The difference of opinions by those "in-the-know" can be significant.

On one hand, Peter Schiff, about whom I just blogged about recently, and who saw the oncoming economic crisis coming with prescient clarity, thinks governments should behave like people -- when the going gets tough, tighten your belt. On the other hand, Nobel prize winner and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, is concerned mainly with the government not spending enough.

Ask ten economists a question and you get eleven answers, the saying goes. So, who to believe in this case?

I really don't know. I just hope Barack Obama is not as stuck in the middle as I am, and that his intuition is the right one.


Sunday, December 28, 2008

 

Something from nothing

I don't know much about Peter Schiff but I know that for a couple of years he has been warning us about the impending economic meltdown, describing what was to come with amazing accuracy. On November 25, 2008, I posted a video clip of Peter Schiff in several TV appearances over the last couple of years being laughed for predictations that proved to eventually be right.

Peter Schiff has an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal about plans to get out of this economic mess, and he's not too happy about what he's hearing:

It would be irresponsible in the extreme for an individual to forestall a personal recession by taking out newer, bigger loans when the old loans can't be repaid. However, this is precisely what we are planning on a national level.

I believe these ideas hold sway largely because they promise happy, pain-free solutions. They are the economic equivalent of miracle weight-loss programs that require no dieting or exercise. The theories permit economists to claim mystic wisdom, governments to pretend that they have the power to dispel hardship with the whir of a printing press, and voters to believe that they can have recovery without sacrifice.

As a follower of the Austrian School of economics I believe that market forces apply equally to people and nations. The problems we face collectively are no different from those we face individually. Belt tightening is required by all, including government.

Governments cannot create but merely redirect. When the government spends, the money has to come from somewhere. If the government doesn't have a surplus, then it must come from taxes. If taxes don't go up, then it must come from increased borrowing. If lenders won't lend, then it must come from the printing press, which is where all these bailouts are headed. But each additional dollar printed diminishes the value those already in circulation. Something cannot be effortlessly created from nothing.

One one side we have this guy, who was right about the economic crisis, and on the other side we have guys like Bob Rubin, who had a hand in crafting the deregulation that helped get us into this giant mess. And who is advising Barack Obama? That's right, the "miracle weight-loss programs that require no dieting or exercise" guys.

I'm feeling queezy about my plans for an early retirement.

 

Eternal life for some

I think far too many American Christians are going soft on us:
A majority of all American Christians (52%) think that at least some non-Christian faiths can lead to eternal life. Indeed, among Christians who believe many religions can lead to eternal life, 80% name at least one non-Christian faith that can do so.
What about me (atheist)? Where am I going?

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

 

Site Map
Home Page
Discussion Forum
Relationship Advice
Humor


Blogroll
(will open new window)


Blogroll Me!

Big, Bad Monsters






Contact Us | Resource Links

Online Shopping Deals URL.biz - Relationships
A Designated SinglesStop.com